Learn more about our comprehensive legal services.
Advising our clients on different opportunities and challenges of the industry.
Developing a unique culture, which blends traditional client care with modern technology and working practices since 1851.
Stay up to date on the latest news and legal insights.
News & Insights
Co-authored by Sarah Lau of Deacons, David Plotinsky and Eli Rymland-Kelly of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
On 28 October 2024, the U.S. Treasury Department issued the Final Outbound, Investment Rule (Outbound Investment Rule or Rule) to implement Executive Order 14105 on “Addressing United States Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern”. The Outbound Investment Rule took effect from 2 January 2025. We discuss below some of the potential impacts of the Rule on non-U.S. Funds with U.S. fund managers and/or U.S. limited partners.
The Outbound Investment Rule would restrict investments by U.S. persons in specified industries deemed to pose a threat to US national security in “countries of concern” which currently cover China, including Hong Kong and Macau. For this purpose, a U.S. person would include a U.S. citizen, a U.S. lawful permanent resident (i.e. “green card holder), an entity organized under the laws of the U.S. (including any foreign branches), subsidiaries of U.S. companies and any person in the U.S., irrespective of nationality. In other words, this would include non-U.S. nationals that are in the United States for any reason, including visiting executives. U.S. persons are also obligated to take all reasonable steps to ensure its “controlled foreign entity” complies with the Outbound Investment Rule and this, inter alia, captures any entity in which a U.S. person:
At a high level, unless any exemptions apply, the Outbound Investment Rule would prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in, or require such U.S. persons to notify the Treasury of “covered transactions” involving a “covered foreign person” who is engaged in “covered activities”.
“Covered transactions” refer to when a U.S. person is directly or indirectly involved in the:
“Covered foreign persons” include:
A “person of a country of concern” includes:
Currently, a “country of concern” is defined to include China and Hong Kong and Macau.
“Covered activities” include certain specified activities related to artificial intelligence systems, quantum computing and semiconductors and microelectronics and the transaction may be classified as prohibited or notifiable based on the criteria of the Outbound Investment Rule.
Potential Impact on non-U.S. Funds managed by U.S. Persons
Under the current rules, U.S. fund managers or advisers managing or advising on non-U.S. domiciled investment funds would be captured under the Outbound Investment Rule and will be subject to its compliance requirements and could potentially face liabilities for the activities of those investment funds. In this instance, such U.S. fund mangers or advisers, as a controlled foreign entity of a U.S. person would need to take all reasonable steps to prevent the investment fund from entered into transactions prohibited under the Outbound Investment Rule or file notifications for any transactions classified as a notifiable transaction if engaged by a U.S. person.
Potential Impact on U.S. Limited Partners
From the investor perspective, certain exemptions under the Outbound Investment Rule would apply. A U.S. limited partner’s passive investment in a non-U.S. fund will be an excepted transaction provided that the limited partner’s committed capital is not more than US$2,000,000 on an aggregate basis or the limited partner secures a binding contractual assurance at the time of the capital commitment that their contributions will not be used to engaged in transactions that would be classified as prohibited or notifiable under the Outbound Investment Rule if engaged in by a U.S. person.
The Outbound Investment Rule also provides for an exception where a transaction is made after 2 January 2025 pursuant to a binding, uncalled capital commitment entered into before such date.
Aside from the exemptions provided under the current regime, the Outbound Investment Rule would mean that U.S. limited partners would need to ensure that it conducts reasonable and sufficient due diligence where it intends to invest in non-U.S. investment funds to determine if such investment fund’s activities may be caught under the Outbound Investment Rule.
In light of the introduction of the Outbound Investment Rule, it may be time for fund managers, investment advisers and limited partners affected to consider whether there are sufficient mechanisms under their existing fund structures to deal with the segregation of potential affected investments (including potentially at the general partnership level) and to consider the necessity of entering into side letters.
Subscribe to Publications
Sign up for our regular updates covering the latest legal developments, regulations and case law.