Learn more about our comprehensive legal services.
Advising our clients on different opportunities and challenges of the industry.
News & Insights
Authored by: Fiona Fong and Faye Meng
On 2 June 2022, the Asset Management Association of China (AMAC) published a notice on matters relating to the registration and filing obligations of Chinese private fund managers (Notice, available here in Chinese). Together with the Notice, AMAC issued (i) revised checklists for the registration application of private fund managers and (ii) key points to note for filing of private funds in Mainland China. AMAC issued separate checklists and key points for (i) private securities fund houses and (ii) private equity and venture capitalist firms.
The revised checklists require information over nine areas including (i) basic information about the applicant, (ii) relevant mechanisms such as risk management, information disclosure and transaction records, (iii) licensing details of the applicant and information of affiliates, (iv) integrity information, (v) financial statements, (vi) information about funders, (vii) information about the largest shareholder and actual controlling person, (vii) information about senior management and (viii) a legal opinion. The revised checklists aim to improve the transparency of the AMAC application process and facilitate the preparation of application materials by private fund managers.
It is worth noting that, among other key points, AMAC specifically reminds managers of the naming rules for private funds. Similar requirements are in fact set out in the Private Investment Funds Naming Guidelines (available in Chinese here) issued by AMAC back in 2018. For private hedge funds:
1) the name of the fund should not include:
2) the managers shall pay attention to:
3) the managers shall also pay attention to whether the fund name contains words that violate laws, administrative regulations or relevant regulations of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and whether it contains words that violate public order and good morals.
In Hong Kong, for an open-ended fund company (OFC), its name and any subsequent change to the name is subject to the review and approval by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). The Code on Open-Ended Fund Companies (OFC Code) provides, inter alia, that the name of an OFC must in the opinion of the SFC not be misleading or otherwise undesirable. The SFC may take into account whether the proposed name is inconsistent with the nature, investment objectives or policy of the OFC; whether it is substantially similar to the name of another OFC; whether it would give investors a sense of assurance or security not justified by the underlying features of the OFC; and whether it might lead investors into inferring or might otherwise create the impression that persons other than the directors and/or investment manager are responsible for the OFC. In our experience, the SFC will review the name of an OFC as well as the name of its sub-fund(s) in the case where the OFC is an umbrella fund, and by reference to relevant rules of the OFC Code, the SFC may require an explanation of the proposed name from the applicant in the process of incorporating an OFC.
Subscribe to Publications
Sign up for our regular updates covering the latest legal developments, regulations and case law.
For media enquiries please contact us at email@example.com.
Tel: +852 2825 9211