Learn more about our comprehensive legal services.
Advising our clients on different opportunities and challenges of the industry.
Developing a unique culture, which blends traditional client care with modern technology and working practices since 1851.
Stay up to date on the latest news and legal insights.
News & Insights
On 18 December 2020, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a public consultation paper (Consultation) on proposed amendments to the Code on Pooled Retirement Funds (PRF Code).
The proposals are part of the SFC’s holistic review of the PRF Code following the revision of the Code on Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds (UT Code) which was implemented in 2019. The proposed changes align certain requirements to those applicable to unit trusts and investment-linked assurance schemes in the SFC Handbook for Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds, Investment-Linked Assurance Schemes and Unlisted Structured Investment Products.
Key proposed changes
Key proposed changes to the PRF Code include:
The SFC is proposing that a product provider (referred to as “applicant company” under the existing PRF Code) would be designated for each PRF and will be responsible for observing or procuring other relevant parties to observe all the requirements of the PRF Code and any authorization conditions imposed by the SFC. The product provider will also have additional obligations under the revised PRF Code.
The SFC is also introducing obligations to clearly state the obligations of insurance companies of PRFs and investment portfolios structured in the form of insurance policies. In particular, the SFC is enhancing requirements for insurance companies performing functions analogous to those of a management company and trustee in respect of a PRF in the form of an insurance policy. The obligations of management companies and trustees of PRFs would be enhanced to align with those under the UT Code.
The current requirements provide that investment portfolios (other than guaranteed funds) shall comply with the applicable core investment requirements under Chapter 7 of the UT Code. The SFC is now proposing investment portfolios to be structured as one of the following: (a) funds investing in SFC-authorized funds, (b) cash management portfolios, (c) guaranteed funds, and (d) direct investment funds. For funds investing in SFC-authorized funds, the names of the underlying funds and their respective investment allocations must be disclosed in the PRF’s principal brochure and any remaining net asset value has to be held in cash or cash equivalents. Direct investment funds (whether in trust form or an insurance policy) will have to be managed by a management company which is (a) licensed or registered for Type 9 regulated activity, and (b) currently managing funds authorized by the SFC under the UT Code. Thus, a direct investment fund in the form of an insurance policy which is currently not managed by an SFC-licensed manager, would need to appoint an SFC-licensed manager which is currently managing funds authorized by the SFC under the UT Code under this new requirement.
The disclosure requirements for PRF principal brochures will be enhanced and updated with reference to the disclosure requirements for comparable products under other SFC product codes. The PRF’s principal brochure must also contain disclosures as required by the newly introduced information disclosure templates which set out the minimum disclosure requirements for each of the four types of investment portfolios. These templates will be published on the SFC’s website.
The SFC proposes a 12-month transitional period for compliance with:
For all other New PRFs, the revised PRF Code will take effect immediately upon its gazettal.
The Consultation is open for comment until 19 March 2021.
Subscribe to Publications
Sign up for our regular updates covering the latest legal developments, regulations and case law.
For media enquiries please contact us at email@example.com.
Tel: +852 2825 9211
Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)