Learn more about our comprehensive legal services.
Advising our clients on different opportunities and challenges of the industry.
News & Insights
On 24 May 2019, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (Exchange) released its conclusions on the consultation paper published last September on the proposal to introduce a specific suspension requirement applicable to listed issuers with disclaimer or adverse audit opinion on their financial statements.
The Exchange decided to implement the proposal, but with modifications taking into account some of the market’s concerns.
New specific suspension requirement
Under the new Main Board Rule 13.50A (GEM Rule 17.49B):
|Note: Examples on how an issuer could provide comfort that a disclaimer or adverse opinion in respect of the relevant issues would no longer be required include:
However, the suspension requirement will not apply where:
The new Main Board Rule 13.50A (GEM Rule 17.49B) will apply to issuers’ preliminary annual results announcements for financial years commencing on or after 1 September 2019.
Under the current delisting rules, issuers may be delisted after their continuous suspension for 18 months for a Main Board issuer (or 12 months for a GEM issuer) (prescribed remedial period).
As a transitional arrangement, the prescribed remedial period will be extended to 24 months for both Main Board and GEM issuers that are suspended solely due to a disclaimer or adverse opinion being issued in the first two financial years after the implementation of the new rule. That means, the 24 months’ remedial period will apply to issuers suspended solely due to disclaimer or adverse opinions on their financial statements for the financial years commencing on or after 1 September 2019 and up to and including 31 August 2021.
Remedial period for circumstances outside issuer’s control
The Exchange has also updated Guidance letter HKEX-GL95-18 on long suspension and delisting to clarify that where an issuer suspended under Main Board Rule 13.50A (GEM Rule 17.49B) has satisfied the Exchange that it has made all reasonable efforts to resolve the issues but, due to reasons outside its control (see examples in the note below), such underlying issues remain unresolved upon expiry of the prescribed remedial period, the Exchange would consider allowing a longer remedial period, with the duration of the period to be determined case by case. Such extension would be brought to the Listing Committee for consideration. The Listing Committee would not normally allow a further extension of the remedial period.
|Note: Examples of circumstances that may be considered to be outside the issuer’s control include:
Subscribe to Publications
Sign up for our regular updates covering the latest legal developments, regulations and case law.
For media enquiries please contact us at email@example.com.
Tel: +852 2825 9211